3 Reasons Evangelicals Need “Religion”

This week my Facebook newsfeed blew up with different people posting the video “Jesus>Religion” and responses varying from gracious to downright angry. I do not intend to respond to the video itself here, as it has been done well elsewhere (and is probably better done in a personal conversation). However, the video does call for understanding religion properly, and particularly, I believe, understanding the value of the word and concept “religion” in Evangelical Christianity.

"The Church in Winter" - Trey Ratcliff

The common Evangelical pronouncement, “I have a relationship, not a religion,” misses out on the great significance of religion. Of course, by religion, I do not mean works-righteousness hypocrisy. But the use of the word to indicate a set of beliefs and practices that multiple people ascribe to in common is incredibly valuable. Particularly, we must preserve the use of the concept and word “religion” as Evangelicals because it protects us from several of our key blind spots in the following ways.

“Religion” preserves community. I’ve written about this before. The claim that Christianity is solely about a personal relationship with Christ can drive us towards an individualistic mindset. While the individual is a vital component of the Christian faith, emphasizing it to the detriment of other aspects of following Jesus is dangerous. Religion, on the other hand, is always a community experience. You cannot just have religion by yourself, in your room. Religion is a communal practice as it points to a commonality that a group of people share. Safeguarding the use of religion reminds us of this communal nature, giving a healthy balance (not overriding) our emphasis on the individual.

“Religion” recognizes the importance of tradition. The community of religious believers extends beyond those whom we regularly meet with in a local setting. It also extends beyond the 21st century. I’m convinced that this is one of the greatest blind spots we have as Evangelicals. We forget that there have been Christians prior to us who wrote and thought and have shared their wealth with us in their writings. Being part of a religion, reminds us that we have a history that is greater than just the hear and now; a history that we ought to pay closer attention to (credit to Richie for bringing this point up).

“Religion” forces us to confront the realities of sin. Often dismissing “religion” also allows us to dismiss the wars of religion or the bad things that have been done in the name of religion. Since they were done by “religious” people, and we are not “religious”, we dismiss them by denying any continuity between them and us. However, this is too easy of an escape. Many who have been involved in such atrocities as the Crusades were sincere believers. Indeed, Bernard of Clairvaux who spoke in support of the Crusades also has much to say to us today about the nature of love in an overly sexualized culture. Was he right to support the Crusades? By no means. But should we just throw him out, and deny that he was an earnest Christian because he made that mistake? Our answer has to be more nuanced than a simple “yes”. To relegate such tragedies to religion, fails to recognize the pervasiveness of sin, something we have to wrestle with. Recognizing that we are a part of the broader religion forces us to reconcile with our history.

There are definitely other reasons to use the word religion to describe Christianity. I am all for recognizing the things that sets Christianity apart from other religions (of which there are many) but the value of remembering that Christianity is a religion, a set of practices and beliefs held by a community, is too high to deny we have one. May we reclaim “religion” and show the world what it can be – a group of believers sharing beliefs and practices to glorify God because of the Son, through the Spirit.

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “3 Reasons Evangelicals Need “Religion”

  1. I agree with everything you said, but in defense of the video, the man was referring to religion as the “works-righteousness hypocrisy” and not the set of beliefs and practices that you so eloquently defended above. I think the real issue I have with the video is perpetuating the negative connotations associated with the word “religion.” But how else would he have conveyed his message so succinctly? You say Jesus>Religion and everybody immediately understands what you mean. Jesus>Works-Righteousness Hypocrisy doesn’t fit on a banner so easily.

    1. Love these thoughts Kelsey. I wasn’t trying to critique the video overall. I actually think there are some other issues with it that other people have addressed well. However, I think I disagree with you that everybody understands what Jesus>Religion means. I believe words have power, and being careless with our words and what they mean can be detrimental. That’s what I was trying to do with this post – defend the word “religion” as valuable for our use. But I agree that for the most part the video was discussing the works righteousness hypocrisy. Thanks for the comment and keeping me on my toes!

      1. Haha! I’ll be your best redhaired heckler.
        But you’re right – I should not have said “everybody.” Another lazy shortcut in communication at the expense of accuracy and truthfulness. There is such great importance to being careful with one’s words. They are so powerful.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s